CMA

unofficial impact factor 1.52

Open Access Research

Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy

Renato E Rossi1*, Giorgio Monasterolo2, Cristoforo Incorvaia3, Philippe Moingeon4, Franco Frati5, Giovanni Passalacqua6, Lucilla Rossi7 and Giorgio W Canonica6

Author Affiliations

1 Allergy Unit, National Health Service, Rete di Allergologia Regione Piemonte, Cuneo 1, Italy

2 Dipartimento di Analisi Chimico-Cliniche e Microbiologia, Ospedali di Fossano e Savigliano, Italy

3 Allergy/Pulmonary rehabilitation, ICP Hospital, Milan, Italy

4 Research and Development, Stallergènes SA, Antony, France

5 Medical and Scientific Department, Stallergenes, Milan, Italy

6 Allergy and Respiratory Diseases DIMI, University of Genoa Italy

7 Laboratorio Centrale di Analisi, Istituto Gaslini, Genoa, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

Clinical and Molecular Allergy 2010, 8:4 doi:10.1186/1476-7961-8-4

Published: 15 March 2010

Abstract

Background

Some studies reported the possible induction of food allergy, caused by neo-sensitization to cross-reacting allergens, during immunotherapy with aeroallergens, while other studies ruled out such possibility.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 (tropomyosin) as well as the appearance of reactions after ingestion of foods containing tropomyosin as a consequence of sublingual mite immunization.

Materials and methods

Specific IgE to Tropomyosin (rPen a 1) before and after mite sublingual immunotherapy in 134 subjects were measured. IgE-specific antibodies for mite extract and recombinant allergen Pen a 1 were evaluated using the immunoenzymatic CAP system (Phadia Diagnostics, Milan, Italy).

Results

All patients had rPen a 1 IgE negative results before and after mite SLIT and did not show positive shrimp extract skin reactivity and serological rPen a 1 IgE conversion after treatment. More important, no patient showed systemic reactions to crustacean ingestion.

Conclusions

Patients did not show neo-sensitization to tropomyosin, a component of the extract (namely mite group 10) administered. An assessment of a patient's possible pre-existing sensitisation to tropomyosin by skin test and/or specific IgE prior to start mite extract immunotherapy is recommended.

Trial Registration

This trial is registered in EudraCT, with the ID number of 2010-02035531.