Differential response of human basophil activation markers: a multi-parameter flow cytometry approach

Salvatore Chirumbolo¹ , Antonio Vella² , Riccardo Ortolani² , Marzia De Gironcoli³ , Pietro Solero¹ , Giuseppe Tridente² and Paolo Bellavite¹

¹Department of Morphological and Biomedical Science-University of Verona, Italy

²Department of Pathology-Section of Immunology-University of Verona, Italy

³Immunotransfusion Service-University Hospital Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy

author email corresponding author email

Clinical and Molecular Allergy 2008, 6:12doi:10.1186/1476-7961-6-12


Published:	16 October 2008

Abstract

Background

Basophils are circulating cells involved in hypersensitivity reactions and allergy but many aspects of their activation, including the sensitivity to external triggering factors and the molecular aspects of cell responses, are still to be focused. In this context, polychromatic flow cytometry (PFC) is a proper tool to investigate basophil function, as it allows to distinguish the expression of several membrane markers upon activation in multiple experimental conditions.

Methods

Cell suspensions were prepared from leukocyte buffy coat of K2-EDTA anticoagulated blood specimens; about 1500-2500 cellular events for each tested sample, gated in the lymphocyte CD45dim area and then electronically purified as HLADRnon expressing/CD123bright, were identified as basophilic cells. Basophil activation with fMLP, anti-IgE and calcium ionophore A23187 was evaluated by studying up-regulation of the indicated membrane markers with a two-laser six-color PFC protocol.

Results

Following stimulation, CD63, CD13, CD45 and the ectoenzyme CD203c up-regulated their membrane expression, while CD69 did not; CD63 expression occurred immediately (within 60 sec) but only in a minority of basophils, even at optimal agonist doses (in 33% and 14% of basophils, following fMLP and anti-IgE stimulation respectively). CD203c up-regulation occurred in the whole basophil population, even in CD63non expressing cells. Dose-dependence curves revealed CD203c as a more sensitive marker than CD63, in response to fMLP but not in response to anti-IgE and to calcium ionophore.

Conclusion

Use of polychromatic flow cytometry allowed efficient basophil electronic purification and identification of different behaviors of the major activation markers. The simultaneous use of two markers of activation and careful choice of activator are essential steps for reliable assessment of human basophil functions.